March 12, 2009 by Paul Godden
in 'Digital Rights, Hacking, Hold the FRONT PAGE, Internet Connectivity, Remote Access Computing, Security, wtf?'
Comments
The BBC demonstrated that by acquiring some software from chatrooms on the internet, they were able to set up their own botnet and take control of 22,000 user’s PCs.
Apparently the BBC are voicing that as this was not done with "criminal intent" it’s not illegal – and that no personal information was obtained from the slave machines.
I’m a little shocked, I must admit. When has a TV corporation had the power to take it on themselves to hack thousands of computers and then in the same breath say it’s not illegal? Just the mere fact that the BBC took control, means they have broken the law. They have unlawfully obtained use of equipment that they didn’t pay for, don’t pay the electricity bill for & don’t pay the user’s ISP for use of the bandwidth. Stealing, as far as I have been aware has always been a criminal activity – and it doesn’t matter if you dress this with "criminal intent" or not. And if it’s not stealing, then it’s a breach of privacy in the most basic form – you have the right to use your own property without interference from anyone else.
So what happens next? I think if you were one of the 22,000 users that had their PCs hijacked – maybe you should send a letter to your local MP, or perhaps contact the Electronic Frontier Foundation. I know that’s the route I would be taking. Read the BBC article here.
American couple to sue Google over “invasion of privacy”... tiscali can’t take the strain – users will pay... UK broadband companies tightening belts... pirate bay letter... Police In The UK Clueless About IT...
Users of Internet Explorer are being urged to switch to a different browser in a bid to escape a serious zero day flaw.





